Independent & educational platform Not a government body. No link or affiliation with any government organisation. Made for learning only. Test only systems you own or are authorised to test. Become a Partner or Sponsor → Full disclaimer

CVE-2026-32144

high

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing s…

Vendor / product: Erlang — erlang\/otp

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 27.3.4.10 and OTP 28.4.2, corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.17.1.2 and 1.20.3, and ssl from 11.2 before 11.2.12.7 and 11.5.4.

CVSS
7.4
7.4 (CVSS v3.1)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Severity source: NVD CVSS v3.1 (nvd@nist.gov)
Timeline (UTC)
Published: 2026-04-07 13:16
Modified: 2026-11-11 20:17
NVD status: Modified
Last synced 5 hours ago
Verified against the source API 2026-11-11 20:41 UTC
Exploitation
Not listed in CISA KEV (as of last catalog sync)
Absence from KEV does not mean a CVE is not exploited. Exploitation status: unknown (no authoritative evidence in our sources).

Affected products

erlang / erlang\/otp ≥27.0 <27.3.4.10, ≥28.0 <28.4.2
erlang / erlang\/public_key ≥1.16 <1.17.1.2, ≥1.18 <1.20.3
erlang / erlang\/ssl ≥11.2 <11.2.12.7, >11.3 <11.5.4

Weakness classification (CWE)

Source: NVD / CISA. “NVD-CWE-Other” and “NVD-CWE-noinfo” mean NVD could not assign a specific weakness.

Mitigation & advisories

Vendor advisory: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32144.html
Vendor advisory: https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
Patch / mitigation: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32144.html
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/49033a6d93a5be0ee0dce04e1fb8b4ae7de1e0c0
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/ac7ff528be857c5d35eb29c7f24106e3a16d4891
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gxrm-pf64-99xm

References

Data sources

NVD CVE API 2.0 — fetched 2026-11-11 20:41 UTC · record ↗

Learn the basics

Understanding CVEs and CVSS Scores

Related CVEs