October 2026 CVE archive
Records last modified in NIST NVD between Oct 1 and Oct 29, 2026 (UTC). Data imported from the NVD CVE API 2.0 and the CISA KEV catalog; each record shows its own source and verification time. The modified view only includes records that were CRITICAL or CISA-KEV-listed when imported — it is not a complete list of every modification.
Total records
22,209
Critical
3,102
High
7,090
Medium
6,615
Low
674
Severity not reported
4,728
In CISA KEV
188
Most affected vendors (by CPE data where available): microsoft (1176), google (780), ibm (323), mozilla (182), oracle (154), adobe (137), linux (126), apache (116), broadcom (113), fabian (98)
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | KEV | Vendor / product | Published | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-19179 IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remot... |
high | 8.2 | — | Ibm / financial transaction manager | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-07 |
| CVE-2026-84074 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 8.9 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84071 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to OS command injection in the U... |
high | 7.2 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84070 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 8.9 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84036 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 7.4 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84034 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulne... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81937 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerabi... |
high | 7.2 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81548 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81549 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 7.7 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81552 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82093 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82094 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 7.1 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-80379 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-80412 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-80425 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81208 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow an authenticated user to... |
high | 7.7 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81536 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 7.7 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81537 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81539 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81545 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-81547 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-16335 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 IBM DataStage could allow a remote a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-16338 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 IBM DataStage could allow a remote a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82896 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 7.6 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82893 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated... |
high | 7.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82892 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbit... |
high | 8.1 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82887 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-82885 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-16428 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 IBM DataStage could allow a remote a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84076 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 7.6 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84077 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass securi... |
high | 8.1 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84081 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass securi... |
high | 8.1 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84083 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation vi... |
high | 7.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84084 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass securi... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84085 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbit... |
high | 8.1 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84086 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 7.2 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84089 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated... |
high | 7.8 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-16466 IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 IBM DataStage could allow a remote a... |
high | 8.8 | — | Ibm / datastage on cloud pak for data | 2026-09-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84105 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 7.7 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
| CVE-2026-84106 IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to... |
high | 8.9 | — | Ibm / guardium data protection | 2026-09-18 | 2026-10-06 |
Sources: NIST NVD (CVE API 2.0) and the CISA KEV catalog. Severity is as stated by the source; missing values are shown as “not reported”, never estimated.